Anonymous asked: are philly girls really that bad you think? how would you rate girls in the top metropolitan cities in the US- shit lets do the world so, nyc, la, philly, san fran, chicago, miami, paris, berlin, london. and i guess throw in any other city you think is legit.

LA has the best bodies and the best All American looking girls. Mind you, they are all shit. Actresses, fame whores, and general idiots. But they are hot and have body for days.

NY Has the most dimes, but more than that it has the cool and stylish. Think about it this way, when you graduate high school, the prom queen, the girl that’s heard how hot she is for her entire life, heads off to LA to make it. And the cute girl who read too many books and was into weird bands and stuff heads off to NYU to make it doing some creative shit. That’s the difference. Now NY has all those girls, and all the models too. We really have a bit of everything in NY, and that’s why I think it’s really the best. But if you want just plain hot American girls (and I mean Americans of all races) LA has NY beat by a mile. I still prefer NY, for me it’s style and substance all the way.

Miami, has all the Latin girls, If that’s your thing, it’s probably gonna be your number one.

The rest of America is shit.

London is pure shit. Like, worse than Middle America. No disrespect to Chung, but someone like her is a mega-star in London because everyone else is so god damn ugly. She is like a rose growing out of a cow-pie, thus the attention she gets.

Paris. French girls are an acquired taste, but if you like them, (I do) it’s amazing. I love it there and think the women are the shit, but it’s a different game, one I’ve not really figured out. So it remains sort of a mystery.

Russia, Moscow? No idea, but I’m sure the women are insanely beautiful and about as pleasant to talk to as a shit flinging mentally retarded leper. 

Wednesday, January 4, 2012 — 1 note
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
  1. boyslife posted this